Solving problems of Tamils is my obligation - Sirisena
Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena on his
achievements, challenges, and the importance of a judicial mechanism
that has the confidence of Tamils.
Emphasising his commitment to resolving Sri Lanka's
Tamil question, President Maithripala Sirisena has said he has an
obligation to address the concerns of the island's Tamils, most of whom
had voted for him.
About 90 per cent of the people in Sri Lanka's
Tamil-dominated north voted for him in the January 2015 elections, he
said. "They have confidence in me that I will solve their problems. So
it is not only my responsibility, but also my obligation to solve their
problems," he told The Hindu in an exclusive interview on Wednesday at
the Presidential Secretariat in Colombo.
Amid growing concern over the apparently slow-paced
reconciliation efforts, President Sirisena said: "Reconciliation is not
something that can be done in a few days."
The government's endeavour must be acceptable to the
Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims and other communities. "That is not an easy
task," he observed.
Asked about accountability for alleged war crimes,
which many Tamils believe is integral to reconciliation, President
Sirisena ruled out participation of international judges in any probe,
as suggested in the UNHRC resolution co-sponsored by Sri Lanka. However,
he added: "We can obtain advice from foreign judicial experts."
He dismissed the view that as leader of the Sri Lanka
Freedom Party, running a consensus government with the United National
Party, he was facing pressure from the faction led by Mahinda Rajapaksa.
"There is no pressure or influence within the party that I cannot
In January 2015, nearly six years after Sri Lanka's
brutal civil war ended, President Maithripala Sirisena came to power
deposing Mahinda Rajapaksa, on the promise of good governance, the
abolition of the executive presidency and reconciliation with the Tamil
minority. His election, to many at home and abroad, heralded hope of a
new beginning for the country. Almost two years later, he is grappling
with old and new challenges - ranging from an open split within the Sri
Lanka Freedom Party he leads, to the frictions of coalition politics in
the country's first national unity government, to growing impatience of
the Northern polity - even as he tries to move ahead with his reformist
Speaking to The Hindu in Colombo, President Sirisena
discusses the progress made so far, the problems that linger, and his
political vision for Sri Lanka.
Excerpts from the interview:
Q. In November 2014, you left the ruling party to join
the common opposition. At that time, you spoke of grave personal risks
associated with the defection that proved historic, leading to a regime
change in Sri Lanka. When you look back now, how does it feel? What do
you consider your biggest success as President?
A. Now 22 months have passed since I became the
President. I am satisfied with my performance during this time. There
are reasons for that. Firstly, I succeeded in getting the 19th Amendment
to the Constitution (that clips powers of the executive President and
strengthens the independence of oversight bodies) passed in parliament.
We actually proposed that the executive powers of the President be
reduced immediately. The Supreme Court said major clauses cannot be
deleted without a referendum. Furthermore, the Supreme Court told us
what could be done with two-thirds majority in parliament. So we have
changed clauses to the maximum extent possible with two-thirds majority
Establishment of independent commissions is another
reason. It was essential for the country to ensure [protection of] human
rights, democratic rights, fundamental rights and the freedom of the
people. I have ensured that people get these rights, I have succeeded in
doing that as President. I have given the maximum possible media
The international community is so satisfied with my
performance that they have completely changed their impression of the
country. I have told the international community that I cannot accept
any proposal that allows foreign judges to probe our domestic matters.
This is another great victory I was able to achieve in this time.
The former President Mahinda Rajapaksa called snap
polls even though he had two more years in power left. There are two
reasons for that.
There were two problems he could not solve as
President. One was the UNHRC (United Nations Human Rights Council)
proposals against our country. The second was that the country was
heavily indebted at that time. We had a national debt of 9,000 billion
[Sri Lankan] rupees. That was a major economic crisis for our country.
I am now dealing with the UNHRC proposals while
protecting the respect and dignity of my country. In order to solve this
major economic crisis, we have been formulating a new economic plan. I
believe in a mixed economy. One is the increase of foreign and local
investments. My second step is to strengthen the export production
market and increase our exports.
The new programme for national reconciliation is being
implemented. It is a major initiative for reconciliation among Sinhala,
Tamil, Muslim, Malay, Burgher and other communities to ensure
coexistence and harmony.
With all these successful efforts I am quite satisfied
with my performance.
Those who have been in power and have lost power are
trying to sabotage all these activities. I am confident that I can face
all these challenges and make our country better. The experience I have
from my 50 years in politics gives me enough strength to meet all these
Q. You spoke about the economy. As someone with a
leftist background now in coalition with the United National Party known
for its right-wing economic policies, how do you think your government
can promote economic growth while safeguarding living standards and
social welfare of farmers and workers?
A. We have a consensual government of the two major
parties. There are similarities as well as differences in the vision and
policies of these two parties. My vision is social democracy. Your
question is how compatible is liberal democracy with social democracy.
The two major parties have agreed on a consensual formula. We need
large-scale investments. We cannot come out of the economic crisis
without such investments. At the same time, enhancing social welfare and
subsidies are also essential. The poor man is the one badly affected by
a market economy. We have to protect the welfare and economy of the
Q. You have been a frequent visitor to the
Tamil-majority Northern Province. How do you respond to the Tamil
political leadership's concern over the pace of reconciliation, with
unresolved issues like militarisation, political prisoners and the call
to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA)?
A. Reconciliation is not something that can be done in
a few days. In the last 22 months I have been to Jaffna as President 11
times. Prior to that no leader went to the north [as often]. I feel very
happy to interact - not just with the Tamil politicians in the north,
but also with the people and obtain their ideas directly. A vast
majority - about 90 per cent of the people - in the north voted for me.
They have confidence in me that I will solve their problems. So it is
not only my responsibility, but also my obligation to solve their
In drafting the new Constitution, we are looking at a
Constitution that will strengthen the reconciliation between the
communities. These things will have to be done keeping the southern
Sinhala-Buddhist masses also satisfied. If the southern people are
opposed to certain things, we cannot have a successful reconciliation
process. Hence our endeavour towards reconciliation must also be
acceptable to the Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims and other communities. That
is not an easy task. But we have to do this challenging job.
Q. Can reconciliation proceed without accountability?
How will you convince the Tamils, who have little confidence in domestic
judicial mechanisms, that an internal probe will be fair?
A. When we came to power, our judiciary was very weak.
One of the reasons we appointed a Chief Justice from the minority
community was to enhance confidence in the judicial system among the
We have improved the quality of the judiciary and its
independence and impartial nature. We can obtain advice from foreign
judicial experts. As per our constitutional provisions, there is no
possibility of foreign judges participating in our judicial process or
conducting cases. I don't have any mandate to act against constitutional
provisions. We have to create a judicial mechanism that has the fullest
confidence of the people in the north.
Q. In the context of the ongoing constitutional
reform, there is a call from the Tamils for federalism. Do you think the
new Constitution can meet that aspiration? Some political actors in the
south want a unitary Constitution, while constitutional experts seem to
suggest that a compromise might be not terming the Constitution either
unitary or federal.
A. People of the south are scared of the word
'federal'. People of the north are scared of the word 'unitary'. What we
should do is not fight over these two words. We should come up with a
formula that is acceptable to all. It takes maturity to understand
devolution. We cannot satisfy the extremist elements either in the north
or in the south. We have to do what is good for, and acceptable to, the
majority of the people. We should not waste time over these arguments.
We have to do whatever is possible as early as possible.
Q. As the leader of the SLFP, how will you hold the
party together given the political pressure from the pro-Rajapaksa
faction, even as you work with the UNP in Sri Lanka's first national
A. This is the first time in history that the two
parties have come together in a consensual government. We were always
used to governing separately, within the political party lines. The
confidence in the SLFP as a party among the people is something lasting
ages. People have recognised and accepted these two major parties - SLFP
and the UNP. Therefore, in these circumstances, there is no possibility
of new political forces coming up. As a political party we have the
ability to solve any problem.
Q. What about pressure within the SLFP?
A. There is no such pressure or influence within the
party that I cannot withstand.
Q. Given the enhanced ties between India and Sri
Lanka, do you think there is reason to expedite signing of the ETCA
(Economic and Technological Cooperation Agreement), which has drawn
considerable local resistance?
A. Since ancient times we have very close relations
with India. This relationship has been built on Hindu and Buddhist
philosophies. We expect to sign trade agreements with quite a number of
countries. These agreements are aimed at benefitting both the signatory
countries, and we don't intend signing any agreement that could be
detrimental to any one country. The proposal for India and Sri Lanka to
sign a fresh [trade] agreement has been there for the last 10-15 years.
Deliberations and discussions continued under different names. We will
enter into an agreement which is not harmful to either party. There
should not be any unnecessary apprehension or fear over this. We cannot
do anything in secrecy, we are transparent and accountable to the
people. We'll discuss it in the Cabinet, and after that it will also be
produced in parliament. If there are any unsuitable clauses, we will
have further discussions and finalise the agreement.
Q. Work on China's port city project has resumed under
your government amid local opposition. How is your government's policy
towards China different from former President Rajapaksa's?
A. The port city agreement, when it was signed during
President Rajapaksa's time, was contradictory to the constitutional
provisions. No government in the past had signed such an agreement. We
amended certain clauses of that agreement as the new government. In such
an agreement, the importance of national security as well as regional
security should be taken into consideration. Both China and India are
our good friends.
Courtesy: President's Media Division